DegreeInfo Distance Learning - online degree forum


Welcome to the DegreeInfo Distance Learning - online degree forum, the oldest and largest distance and online learning community on the Web.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   DegreeInfo Distance Learning - online degree forum > Accreditation Discussions (RA, DETC, state approval, and unaccredited schools)

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-07-2002, 10:37 PM
RJT RJT is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 247
Talking City University LA?

What's the overall consenses of thier MBA program? Despite some ealier reservations, after researching, it seems that they once had a strong positive reputation and reccomendations from many Govt. Officials. What I like is that you can get a degree there on almost any topic that you have an educational interest.

Also, I kind of like the metro sounding name of "City University of Los Angeles". May sound impressive on my resume'. One interesting point is that they keep the LA name but are in HW.

I realize that they are not RA, but they are state liscenced by HW, and as such are legally able to grant degrees. However, I know that it doesn't make them legit (but that's in the eye of the beholder as well).

Open to discussions - not insults.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-08-2002, 12:59 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 29
There was a recent discussion about
CULA at DegreeInfo. You can find it at:

http://www.degreeinfo.com/forums/sho...?threadid=4921

DM

"Be afraid, be very afraid."
-- the Geena Davis character in "The Fly"
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-10-2002, 07:54 AM
Ike Ike is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,476
Re: City University LA?

Quote:
Originally posted by RJT
What's the overall consenses of thier MBA program?

Worthless.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-10-2002, 09:12 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 4,249
Re: Re: City University LA?

Quote:
Originally posted by Ike


Worthless.
RJT doesn't seem to care whether or not the degree has any utility. He seems much more concerned about whether or not it has a state license.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-10-2002, 01:20 PM
RJT RJT is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 247
Worthless?

Why are they worthless now, when once they had a good repuation?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-10-2002, 01:33 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 4,249
Re: Worthless?

Quote:
Originally posted by RJT
Why are they worthless now, when once they had a good repuation?
Why do you say that they once had a good reputation?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-10-2002, 03:29 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: California, USA
Posts: 5,536
Quote:
Originally posted by Bill Huffman
Why do you say that they once had a good reputation?
Because RJT is trolling, and that's his hook.

K-W, CULA, Berne, Senior U. ...

It's a little game that he's playing.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-11-2002, 09:57 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 4,249
Quote:
Originally posted by BillDayson
Because RJT is trolling, and that's his hook.

K-W, CULA, Berne, Senior U. ...

It's a little game that he's playing.
You make a very convincing argument.

I still have a hard time letting his horrible advice stand even though his delivery is ...ah... not real convincing. His advice would just be too damaging if anyone was naive enough to believe it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-11-2002, 11:39 AM
member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 587
Plonker, Wanker and ????

Quote:
Originally posted by Bill Huffman


You make a very convincing argument.

I still have a hard time letting his horrible advice stand even though his delivery is ...ah... not real convincing. His advice would just be too damaging if anyone was naive enough to believe it.
If we call RJT a Plonker, the UK readers will not take any notice of him and his opinions, if we call him a Wanker, no Oz/NZ readers will take any notice of him or his opinions ... what do we do to scare the Americans off - say that he is George Bush's mate?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-11-2002, 12:27 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 4,249
Re: Plonker, Wanker and ????

Quote:
Originally posted by Peter French


If we call RJT a Plonker, the UK readers will not take any notice of him and his opinions, if we call him a Wanker, no Oz/NZ readers will take any notice of him or his opinions ... what do we do to scare the Americans off - say that he is George Bush's mate?
Does George Bush's mate mean Dick Cheney or Barbara Bush? Somehow neither seems to match well with plonker and wanker though. Plonker and wanker are nice because it would seem to imply a fair bit of fantasy or self delusion. I've searched back into my middle school vocabulary and have come up dry.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-11-2002, 01:30 PM
RJT RJT is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 247
Angry Response

Rebuttal:

The reputation I was refferring to was the one that John Bear mentioned, where there were high level awards, and recognition publications from senior goverment officals in CA on the founders wall. Also, once they were state liscenced in CA. If they were a DM, how come so many awards?

AS far as my school goes, I am wriing my 75 page APA paper. if you feel that this is not work - think again!!! Like I said more work here than U of Pheonix.

I do not work for any school, but I am proud of my DL accomplishment!! My accomplishment here is work.

If I wanted just a Diploma, I'd send in my $195.00 to Instant degrees.com. However, I am attending a state liscenced and I feel respectable school - and offers real course work.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-11-2002, 02:06 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 388
Re: Response

Quote:
Originally posted by RJT
However, I am attending a state liscenced and I feel respectable school - and offers real course work.
Yawn.

You're not attending anything.. especially a school. You're sending correspondence to a "shell" address in Wyoming, established in the hopes that CA BPVE won't notice the"administrative offices" in California. This is the same reason they've, as you put it, "chosen" not to register students from California. There's no meaningful academic oversight, no peer review, no published standards for awarding prior-learning credit.. in short, nothing that gives a school credibility, and VERY little that gives it legality.

Please, for the love of God, don't cut-and-paste KWU's manifesto about the nature of accreditation (you know, the one on their web site that quotes the "Department of Health, Education & Welfare.") I accept that they probably aren't breaking WY law, despite having no real presence there (unless you count the "incorporation service" in that building) and probably being ineligible for licensure on that basis. But they're a joke regardless.

Given your opinions, I would've actually recommended the $195 "instant diploma." Just as much utility, institutional oversight, and academic credibility.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-11-2002, 03:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Iowa City, Iowa, USA
Posts: 552
Re: Response

Quote:
Originally posted by RJT
[b]...The reputation I was refferring to was the one that John Bear mentioned, where there were high level awards, and recognition publications from senior goverment officals in CA on the founders wall. Also, once they were state liscenced in CA. If they were a DM, how come so many awards? ...
In John Bear's post in this thread on CA-approved universities he said:
Quote:
Founder/owner Henry Anderson must be extremely well connected politically. When I visited, there were an amazing number of proclamations and awards on his walls -- dozens and dozens -- including 'bigtime' stuff -- Los Angeles City Council, testimonials from 3 or 4 governors (of the "My friend, Henry" sort), state and national agencies, and so on.
It appears not only possible but probable that the proclamations etc. were addressed to Henry Anderson, not to CULA, and may well have been in response to political contributions.

And being licensed in the past is meaningless. CULA lost its approval at least seven years ago. Schools can start out good -- or at least with good intentions -- and fail to achieve or maintain quality educational programs.

Actually, state licensure in the present is largely meaningless. When was the last time Wyoming or Montana even investigated a school, much less revoked a license?
__________________
Kristin Evenson Hirst
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-11-2002, 07:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,477
And if you REALLY want to know what Wyoming thinks of it's "Private Institutions - Licensed Private Post-Secondary Schools" read some of thier FAQ's ".


"...

Q. What is a license?
A. A license is a non-transferable document issued by the Wyoming Department of Education to a post secondary education institution located within the state or located out of state, but whose agents solicit students within the state in the name of the institution that permits the institution to solicit, offer, and maintain a course of instruction.

Q. What is accreditation?
A. Accreditation is a voluntary process that colleges and schools elect to participate in. It is not a state function. Accreditation assures that an institution's programs have met established standards for educational effectiveness.
To insure a basic level of quality, accreditation through non-governmental peer evaluation has been instituted. Regional and national private educational associations have assumed this role. You can access these institutions on the U.S. Department of Education's website at www.ed.gov.


Q. Does the state of Wyoming accredit the private schools it licenses?
A. No. Wyoming does not accredit post secondary schools.
...."

And yes they do say
"...
Q. What is licensing?
A. Licensing is the process used by the state of Wyoming to ensure that the educational institution meets the minimum standards stipulated by statute and rules and regulations.
..."

IMHO Wyoming Dept of Education seems to want to do something, but has their hands tied by the politicians!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-11-2002, 08:10 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 4,249
Re: Response

Quote:
Originally posted by RJT
Rebuttal:

The reputation I was refferring to was the one that John Bear mentioned, where there were high level awards, and recognition publications from senior goverment officals in CA on the founders wall. Also, once they were state liscenced in CA. If they were a DM, how come so many awards?

AS far as my school goes, I am wriing my 75 page APA paper. if you feel that this is not work - think again!!! Like I said more work here than U of Pheonix.

I do not work for any school, but I am proud of my DL accomplishment!! My accomplishment here is work.

If I wanted just a Diploma, I'd send in my $195.00 to Instant degrees.com. However, I am attending a state liscenced and I feel respectable school - and offers real course work.
RJT, you're one of three things.
1. A Shill
2. A Troll
3. A naive person that has swallowed the less than wonderful school hype hook-line-and-sinker

Here's the reasons that I am right now leaning to one of the first two choices. (Please correct me where I've misunderstood.)
You said that you worked for a Fortune 500 company and they had evaluated the K-W program and had approved it. Yet you refuse to tell us the name of this company. For a newbie to the forum you've already started up a large number of threads. This is more the behavior of 1 or 2 rather than choice 3. You claim to have years of experience working in human resources yet your posts are barely legible. You post copies of K-W advertising hype as proof that K-W is a great school and then in the same post claim that I'm biased. You claim that CULA had a great reputation. You apparently claim to have Bear's Guide but apparently haven't understood much of anything that you've read in it. You made a very lame excuse for not wanting to send me a copy of the K-W catalog. You keep pushing the virtues of having a state license yet you haven't named any advantage to a state license and you pigheadedly ignore everyone telling you that a state license doesn't mean squat when you're talking about school quality. You refuse to address details of graduation requirements from K-W. You seem to support many less than wonderful schools like K-W, Berne, CULA, and Senior U. You ignore questions whenever convenient or even inconvenient.

However, it doesn't really matter if you fall into category 1, 2, or 3 because the bottom line is that the things that you are saying could mess up the lives of people if they were naive enough to believe you.

Now in the off chance that you are choice number three, let me leave you with these two thoughts.
1. ONLY less than wonderful schools do things like give 60 credits to people that claim to have 5 years of work.
2. I have not lied to you. Everyone has only been speaking the truth. I guarantee to you that if I said something that was incorrect and pertinent someone would correct it. I do not consider myself a distance learning expert but a good portion of the people reading this forum are experts in the area.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-18-2002, 10:53 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Las Cruces NM USA
Posts: 449
Question

What's the technical difference between a shill and a troll? And is "shill" spelt "schill" auf Deutsch?

Nosborne, JD
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-18-2002, 11:19 AM
member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,792
Isn't a shill someone in a casino who works for the house and keeps winning to show everyone how easy it is.

I believe a troll would be classified as a poo disturber.

Schuel most definitely but then I don't speak a word of German.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-18-2002, 11:42 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 4,249
Quote:
Originally posted by Nosborne
What's the technical difference between a shill and a troll? And is "shill" spelt "schill" auf Deutsch?
I used the word shill from the dictionary. What I meant was, a shill would be a plant by KWU. Someone to try and stir up positive interest in KWU and perhaps get some new students.

A troll would mean someone that is trying to just stir things up and would probably just get amusement out of it. This is from the common usage of the word troll on Usenet. Typically a troll will say things that they may not even agree with just inorder to "stir the pot" and see what happens.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.0 RC3
All posts and content (c) 2001-2010 DegreeInfo.com LLC. None of the information contained herein may be copied or reproduced without the express written permission of DegreeInfo.com, LLCAd Management plugin by RedTyger

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134